Moral Considerations

The ethical things was basically guaranteed, with regards to the assistance from Quality Zero. of Ministry away from Wellness. Their carry out is approved by the Ethics and Lookup Chamber out of brand new Centro de- Filosofia age Ciencias Humanas of the Universidade Government create Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) (CAAE No. 03490118.8. and you can Protocol Zero. 3.). With the front page of your own on the web questionnaire, there is the latest Totally free and you can Advised Consent Name (FICT), and therefore presented information regarding the dangers and you can advantages of reacting the data, and also the be sure away from withdrawal out of concur, in the place of prejudice and at any moment. Just those professionals whom checked the latest concur solution had entry to the research blogs. People that didn’t take a look at concur solution was in fact redirected so you’re able to the conclusion the latest survey.

To analyze you can differences in PCM and you may NCM, with regards to the sociodemographic parameters: sex, profession, care of young sisters, visibility or absence of somebody, and having or not having pupils, evaluations between communities were made with the Mann-Whitney U attempt ( Dining table step 1).

In the first, the partnership ranging from PCM and you may NCM is examined and it also is actually discovered that PCM (M = ; DP = ) correlates adversely to your NCM (Yards = ; DP = ); p =

Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation (U = 37; p = .035; PS _est = .47), presence/absence of partner (U = 10; p = .000; PS _est = .29) and presence/absence of children (U = 21; p = .002; PS _est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed (Mdn = ), who had one or more children (Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship (Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked (Mdn = ), who had no children (Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship (Mdn = ).

On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex (U = 19; p = .000; PS _est = .43) and the presence/absence of children (U = 10; p = .000; PS _est = .34). It was observed that both women (Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children (Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men (Mdn = ) and participants with children (Mdn = ).

Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. PCM levels showed no differences between people who were dating and people who were married or in a stable union (U = 29; p = .039; PS _est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union (U = 5; p = .000; PS _est = .41), of which married people (Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union (Mdn = ).

Two Spearman correlations was conducted. 000; roentgen = -.494; roentgen dos = .24. Regarding the next study new dating anywhere between PCM, NCM and you may 16 private and you will contextual details were tested and certainly will rise above the crowd into the Table 2. Poor connections was indeed https://lovingwomen.org/sv/blog/colombianska-datingsajter/ discovered one another positive and negative ranging from PCM or NCM and you can twelve of one’s variables looked at. Especially the latest sociodemographic details: “amount of sisters” and “birth buy” plus the personality things: “conscientiousness” and “transparency playing” shown no tall correlations with PCM and you will NCM.